ANGELS LANDING NAPA CABERNET SAUVIGNON (2014)

“The best wine is that which tastes good to thine own palette.”  … Pliny the Elder.

Respecting that all palates are personal, I don’t have wine “rules,” though I admit to having “preferences”.  One of them is to generally avoid domestically produced red wines priced under $15. (And yes, there are some exceptions.  And good whites are available under $15, but those again are whites. And bargains can be found in “old world” red wines). That aside, and with my personal preference stated, when I saw this bottle of (2014) “Angel’s Landing Napa” Cabernet Sauvignon for sale retailing at $11.99, I was cautious.  With Napa Cabernet Sauvignon grapes averaging $5,930 per ton in 2014, one should be cautious approaching a bottle priced at $12.

Angel’s Landing is “vinted and bottled” by Great Domains & Estates, neither name being attached to a vineyard.  “Vinted and bottled” is not the same as “Estate bottled.” Then again, there are several well-known wineries that source their grapes, have legions of passionate admirers, and consistently are awarded high ratings. (It does behoove one to keep an open mind).  But “Vinted and bottled” is also not the same as “Produced and bottled by.” Nor is it the same as “Made and bottled by.”  Depending on how one understands the term, it may mean that as little as 10% of the wine was fermented at the winery, or even that the name on the label is not connected to the production of the wine in any way.   

Angel’s Landing is a label represented by the Mendocino Wine Company which represents many brands.  Call it “grey” or “white” labeling, I’ll even concede in advance that the issue essentially comes down to what’s inside the bottle. Yet with such “white labeling”, it’s difficult to learn about that.  And for those who want to confirm why their senses are telling them what they think they are, it’s this lack of transparency that is troubling.  One cannot get the tech specs.  Is the wine blended with other varieties?  (Wines labeled a varietal in the U.S. may contain up to 25% other grapes). What’s the residual sugar?  How was the wine made?  Who actually made it? How much oak, what type, how long was it aged?   Most wines so labeled don’t have web sites and seldom are professionally reviewed.  Information develops knowledge and appreciation and – most important - understanding.  And for some of us, that’s essential to a good experience.   

In this case, the fruit is indeed Napa, mostly from the Yountville area vineyards known for Chateau Montelena.  In fact, Grgich Hills‘ Mike Grgich (formally of Chateau Montelena) was responsible for bringing Chateau Montelena to the world’s stage in the Paris Wine trials of 1976.  Dominus, Domaine Chandon, Charles Krug and others also are in Yountville. Its pedigree is established.   But appellation alone does not guarantee anything other than locale. And Yountville is not identified on the label.  …………….. And the back label refers only to “Napa County.”

So regarding Angel’s Landing, I think I need to respect Pliny the Elder’s foresight.  The wine is deep purple in the glass. The nose, for me, is all blackberry jam with some crème de cassis and a hint of black licorice.  The mouthfeel is liquid silk. While Cabernet Sauvignon is noted for tannins, I found them so rounded, with almost no grip, that I resented not being able to access more information. The palate revealed a reduction of blackberry sauce with blackberry preserves dominating the back taste. Upfront was some Christmas spice.  A note of green pepper is common in Cabernet Sauvignon, but I often miss that as I did again with Angels Landing. Others report sage and iodine (I did not). Another described the wine as masculine.  Though not comfortable today with such terms, I’d describe it as more feminine because I found the wine somewhat sweet and, as I said, the tannins were so soft as to be almost nonexistent.

For the price, I’d have to say this Cab offers value if you’re looking for an easy drinking red wine that’s likely to be a crowd pleaser.  I later discovered its ARP is actually $22 (the price of $11.99 having been a “close out” sale price).  For my palate, I found the wine somewhat sweet. But for those finding Cabernet Sauvignon generally too tannic, too dry, this could be the bottle they’ve been waiting for.

Cheers!
……………. Jim 

Follow and Like Wine Mizer on Facebook for mini wine reviews, suggestions on food & wine pairing, general news about wineries and all things wine.



QUIMERA (2012) ACHAVAL FERRER

“It is not our differences that divide us. It is our inability to recognize, accept, and celebrate those differences.” …… Audre Lorde

Achaval-Ferrer doesn’t seem particularly Irish, but it certainly helped me elevate my St. Patrick’s Day meal of asparagus soup (it’s green - such is expected) and the not-so-really Irish Corned Beef & Cabbage traditional plate with the aid of their (2012) “Quimera” Bordeaux Blend from Mendoza Argentina. It’s 24% Cabernet Franc, 16% Merlot, 8% Cabernet Sauvignon, 2% Petit Verdot and 50% Malbec. Each of these grapes is allowed in Bordeaux blends, though seldom are all used. And while France is the original home of Malbec, Argentina has since become the area of choice among consumers worldwide. 

I enjoy both styles, but there’s no denying the finished wines are different.  Think Pinot Gris and Pinot Grigio, or Syrah and Shiraz.  Same grapes, but different wines.  Malbec from France (sometimes called Cot or Auxxerois there) generally has more structure and firmer tannins. Within the terroir of Argentina however, the grape yields a wine that is softer, more velvety and fruit forward.  Quimera is a Bordeaux blend for those with a bent toward “new world” character, but who still appreciate “old world” essence.  The wine offers a slightly fruit forward profile but without being jammy. It also accomplishes this without being aggressively dry or tannic.  A nice and balanced mid-point.

Deep purple in the glass, the nose offers cassis, green pepper (from the Cabernet Sauvignon), and notes of mixed dark berries in bitter chocolate. Silky in the mouth, but with just enough grip to be pleasant, the wine offers a hint of rosemary with layers of blue and blackberry with some black pepper spice and red cherry that announces itself as you slurp air through the wine. I’ve tasted and written about Achaval Ferrer wines before and remain impressed throughout their line. From entry to top label, Achaval Ferrer produces value at each price point, making wines that can be enjoyed for special occasions or everyday enjoyment. A 2012 ”Finca Altamira” (my favorite) is a single-vineyard Malbec by Achaval Ferrer and retails for about $115.  But they also produce a 2015 Malbec (rated 91 points by Robert Parker) and available retail for just $24.99.

Check out the photo of the bottle’s back label.  Any winery that provides such detailed information on the back label, instead of marketing foo-foo, is obviously very dedicated and proud of what they put inside the bottle.  The Cabernet Franc and Merlot are from their vineyards in Tupungato at an elevation of 3445 - 3600 feet.  Cabernet Sauvignon (old vine) is from the Medano vineyards (2400 – 2625 feet) and the Malbec and Petit Verdot from Medrano and the Lujan de Cuyo (3150 – 3400 feet).  Good sun but with cooling breezes and occasional cloud cover allow for slowly ripening fruit with delicious ratios of acid to sugar.  Malbec, in particular, can produce a wine that is flabby and under structured when vines are given too much sun.    

Grapes were hand harvested from March 7 to March 21, 2012 and yields were restricted to 1.3 tons per acre.  Put in terms that we can all appreciate, it takes two vines to produce enough juice for one bottle of Quimera.  In a nod to “old world” winemaking, Quimera is fermented in cement tanks (with pump overs for maximum extraction).  Aging is 12 months with 60% in one year French oak and the balance in new French barrel.

Quimerais $34.99.  It earned 92 points from Wine Spectator, 90 points from Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate and Vinous, and 17.5 (out of 20) from Decanter.  It’s always reassuring to know that one’s impression is shared by others considered experts in the field.  But for me, the decision was easy. One taste and I recognized that this was a classy but classic Bordeaux.

Salud!
…………Jim  

Since my last blog post, I’ve posted approximately eighty shorter but informative reviews on Facebook. If you haven’t yet liked me on Facebook, you’re missing out on industry news, food & wine pairing suggestions and lots more.

TECH SPECS FOR QUIMERA
ALC:                             14.5%
pH:                                  3.7
(Total) Acidity:               6.71 g/L
Brix at Harvest                        25
Vine Training:             Vertical shoot positioning, 1.7 – 1.8 meters high (5.57 – 5.9 feet)
Winemakers:               Santiago Achaval; and Roberto Cipresso
Production:                  7,212 cases

The wine is ageable but enjoyable now and is not fined or filtered.  It is recommended you decant the wine one hour prior to se